Quantcast
The authority for brokers and agents selling core, voluntary and retirement products

Article

Going rogue on reform 

I can’t decide who’s ticked me off more this morning: voters, the elected elite or marketing reps who can’t return phone calls.  
Print This Article
Return To Article
Normal Text
Large Text

Americans want their cake. They want a fork to eat with. But don’t tell them they can’t have seconds. Cuz then you’re just being mean. Or worse, “violating their rights.” 

On the other hand, the feds seem to have more daddy issues than Carrie Prejean. I can’t decide who’s ticked me off more this morning: voters, the elected elite or marketing reps who can’t return phone calls. (I know one way big carriers can cut costs ... but that’s another story.)

But I’m getting ahead of myself here.

A new AP poll shows Americans love the idea of a public health care plan that competes with the private carriers. But, when they hear the rest of the story – that the feds will also influence the medical care they receive – they change their minds faster than Geithner on Wall Street.

Bottom line, Americans want it both ways. And it makes about as much sense as my son getting sent to the principal’s office last month, then scribbling out his wish list to Santa as soon as he gets home.

Then we have the recent federal study this week that stirred nearly everyone into a frenzy with its declaration that maybe we don’t need so many mammograms after all. This study – which, for the most part, simply reinterpreted existing data – declared that women don’t need the life-saving exams until they’re 50. And those self exams simply aren’t necessary.

I don’t know about you, but its sounds like the best argument I’ve heard yet for keeping the suits in the beltway, and out of our exam rooms.

 



Discuss This Article

Name:
Email (will not be published):
Subject:
Comment:

    • 11/18/2009 12:54:24 PM
    • Fred Orth
    • confusion
    • Denis, I think that the real problem is that our population is totally confused (and selfish). Most minimally utilize their health plan and really would prefer to not see any issue. Eventually, almost all see the disaster of our system, when it is too late. The reality is that all of the "players" in the healthcare debate perfer to make "hay" for a decade and then see how many potential customers can afford premiums for a family of four somewhere between 29m and 37m, depending upon who you listen to. Talk about rationing and talk about a collapse of the economy!
    • 11/18/2009 2:00:24 PM
    • DestinyBender
    • Confusion
    • when you see the words Carrie Prejean, frenzy and self-exams used in the same blog, its no wonder Americans get dazed and confused about Health Care. P.s. Santa - call me.
    • 11/18/2009 3:04:06 PM
    • Lemonton
    • regarding selfishness
    • "Americans want it both ways", for a chance I can agree in something with you, Denis. In general the public (and we all) want everything, right now, for free and forever. But healthcare is a limited resource so, what is more important? healthcare for the whole population or just MY, MY, MY healthcare? We all tend to be selfish and our hearts weep for our uninsured neighbor…until the reform plan considered to give him/her some relief touches MY coverage. Then my neighbor can go rot and have a painful death in hell! And let's not talk about the selfishness of insurance companies, drug makers, etc. The only reform these want is to keep the same oligopoly, I mean "free market" system (sorry), with the government sending them the 50 million uninsured as new customers, carrying a subsidy coupon for their coverage and without giving anything back. It is not only Americans (the people) who want it both ways, but CORPORATE AMERICA who also want it both ways.
    • 11/18/2009 3:22:18 PM
    • Quinn
    • Did someone say cake?
    • Kind of like the two students who were running for class president. One gave a great speech, was focused on attainable goals and had teacher and parental support. The other got up and offered cake to the students. Of course everyone voted for the student who offered cake. Then that student had no idea how to get it... Sound familiar? Unfortunately I think the citizens who want a public plan are like the students who voted... They know what they want, but haven't thought about the feasibility of attaining it. They wanna be covered at a minimal cost, have sufficient coverage, AND have the freedom to choose a provider (assuming we will still have an abundance of PC physicians left). Unfortunately those who still like the idea of a public plan probably haven't read the fine print, nor realize the ultimate cost... Its a "gimme-gimme" attitude.
    • 11/18/2009 4:29:49 PM
    • Laurie L. Bracelin
    • Roque on Reform
    • When you ask Americans what the public health plan will actually look like; what is the deductible?, what are your copays?, what physician and hospital network would you use?, no one can give you an answer because NOBODY KNOWS. Wise up people, who would spend trillions of dollars on the unknown? This latest argument to now limit life-saving mammograms to women age 50+ is just the beginning of health care rationing. Wake up and smell the stench America,this is just the beginning of our health care system beginning to rot.


www.summitbusinessmedia.com Copyright Benefits Selling. A Summit Business Media publication. All Rights Reserved.